Adaptive Reuse of Built Heritage for Public Uses. A Creative and Constantly Evolving Design Practice

  • DICEA UNIVPM, Ancona, Italy

Abstract

The extraordinary amount of disused, abandoned or ruined built heritage - both monumental and ordinary, listed or not - can be traced as one of the characteristics of contemporary urban culture in Europe, especially in mediterranean contexts. The emergence and development of the so-called ‘knowledge economies’ in the creative field, the promotion of recycling practices, sustainability issues, environmental and resource conservation policies, and a renewed sensitivity towards existing heritage by the academic and professional community, make adaptive reuse practice increasingly important in both project practice and academic dis-course, especially in the European continental context. The paper aims to investigate and analyse the main characteristics and concepts underlying the adaptive reuse of built heritage as a distinctive contemporary design practice, starting with a theoretical examination of its evolution from spontaneous practice to aesthetic one, to moves then to a critical reading of the “design attitudes” of contemporary projects towards the existing, with particular focus on recent interventions characterized by innovative and resource-saving approaches to the heritage, and on public-related uses and functions, in order to draw a critical-theoretical background for further researches on the field.

Download

Cite this article

Chiacchiera, F. (2025). Adaptive Reuse of Built Heritage for Public Uses. A Creative and Constantly Evolving Design Practice. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 114-119). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu

References

  1. Flores R, Prats E. La disciplina dell’esistente. In: Posocco P, Raitano M, editors. La seconda vita degli edifici. Macerata: Quodlibet; 2016. p. 115–25.
  2. Vincenzo Latina. “T T T“, the three “T“s of reuse. AREA n166. 2019;4–9.
  3. Plevoets B, Van Cleempoel K. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage. New York : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge; 2019.
  4. Suffice it to mention that, in recent editions, three of the six winners of the prize belong to this category: the Grand Parc Bordeaux by Lacaton & Vassal, the DeFlat Kleiburg by NL Architects and XVW Architecture, and the Neues Museum by David Chipperfield. An analysis of the finalists and selected projects further confirms that a significant portion of European architectural production focuses on reuse, recycling, and upgrading of the existing built heritage.
  5. Treccani https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ site visited 05/12/2024 – translation by the author.
  6. Treccani https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ site visited 05/12/2024 - translation by the author.
  7. Posocco P. Modificare per conservare. In: La seconda vita degli edifici. Quodlibet; 2016. p. 47–76.
  8. Machado R. Old buildings as palimpsest: Toward a theory of remodeling. In: Progressive Architecture [Internet]. 1976. p. 46–69. Available from: https://api.seman-ticscholar.org/CorpusID:115251754
  9. Corboz A. The Land as Palimpsest. Diogenes. 1983 Mar 26;31(121):12–34.
  10. Wong L. Adaptive Reuse. De Gruyter; 2016.
  11. Bollack F. Reflection on the art of incomplete. Area. 2016 Sep;4–11.
  12. Massarente A. Fragments of antiquity in modern architecture. Area. 2016 Sep;144–9.
  13. Unger RM. The Knowledge Economy. VErso; 2019.
  14. Roberta Franceschinelli. Spazi del possibile. Roma: Franco Angeli; 2021.
  15. - guidato dall’Agenda 2030 delle Nazioni Unite e dai suoi Obiettivi di Sviluppo Sostenibile.
  16. Stone S. Notes towards a Definition of Adaptive Reuse. Architecture. 2023 Aug 28;3(3):477–89.
  17. Baum M, Christiaansee K. City as Loft. Adaptive Reuse as a resource for sustaina-ble urban development. Zurich: ETH, gta Verlag; 2012. 8–13 p.
  18. Baum M. Re-use : From Exception to Normality: Re-use in Urban Development. In: Rieniets T, Kretschmann N, Salewski C, editors. Jovis; 2014. p. 154. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/93647.
  19. Rossetti M. Lacaton A., Vassal J.P., Walker E., Puente M. (a cura di), laca-ton&vassal: free space transformation habiter / espacio libre transformación habiter. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment. 2022 Jul 26;(24):273–4.
  20. Caliari PF. La forma nel tempo. In: Cattiodoro S, editor. Il fondamento effimero dell’architettura. Rome: Aracne; 2010. p. 7–14.
  21. Lanz F, Pendlebury J. Adaptive reuse: a critical review. The Journal of Architecture. 2022 Apr 3;27(2–3):441–62.
  22. The emblematic case of the multi-decade path followed by Giancarlo De Carlo for the city of Urbino serves as a “spiritual father” for many other interventions an policies of public heritage regeneration aimed at adapting it to contemporary uses.

Related articles

Issue contents

Adriano Magliocco, Paola Sabbion

pp. 36-39

Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger

pp. 98-103

Sara Ghirardini, Amath Luca Diatta

pp. 104-109

Francesco Chiacchiera
Adaptive Reuse of Built Heritage for Public Uses. A Creative and Constantly Evolving Design Practice

pp. 114-119

Tanya Brefelean, Ioan-Sergiu Brefelean

pp. 124-127

Sabin-Andrei Țenea

pp. 148-155

Adelina Gabriela Lupu

pp. 156-159

Antonio De Rossi, Carlo Deregibus, Matteo Tempestini

pp. 184-191

Camilla Donantoni

pp. 204-209

Greta Allegretti, Pietro Brunazzi

pp. 210-215

Vlad Iosif

pp. 216-219

Astrid Rottman, Diana Pascu

pp. 220-225

Mihaela Pelteacu, Alexandra Diana Dunel, Alexandra Diana Stan

pp. 280-285