Abstract
The extraordinary amount of disused, abandoned or ruined built heritage - both monumental and ordinary, listed or not - can be traced as one of the characteristics of contemporary urban culture in Europe, especially in mediterranean contexts. The emergence and development of the so-called ‘knowledge economies’ in the creative field, the promotion of recycling practices, sustainability issues, environmental and resource conservation policies, and a renewed sensitivity towards existing heritage by the academic and professional community, make adaptive reuse practice increasingly important in both project practice and academic dis-course, especially in the European continental context. The paper aims to investigate and analyse the main characteristics and concepts underlying the adaptive reuse of built heritage as a distinctive contemporary design practice, starting with a theoretical examination of its evolution from spontaneous practice to aesthetic one, to moves then to a critical reading of the “design attitudes” of contemporary projects towards the existing, with particular focus on recent interventions characterized by innovative and resource-saving approaches to the heritage, and on public-related uses and functions, in order to draw a critical-theoretical background for further researches on the field.
Download
Cite this article
Chiacchiera, F. (2025). Adaptive Reuse of Built Heritage for Public Uses. A Creative and Constantly Evolving Design Practice. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 114-119). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu
References
- Flores R, Prats E. La disciplina dell’esistente. In: Posocco P, Raitano M, editors. La seconda vita degli edifici. Macerata: Quodlibet; 2016. p. 115–25.
- Vincenzo Latina. “T T T“, the three “T“s of reuse. AREA n166. 2019;4–9.
- Plevoets B, Van Cleempoel K. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage. New York : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge; 2019.
- Suffice it to mention that, in recent editions, three of the six winners of the prize belong to this category: the Grand Parc Bordeaux by Lacaton & Vassal, the DeFlat Kleiburg by NL Architects and XVW Architecture, and the Neues Museum by David Chipperfield. An analysis of the finalists and selected projects further confirms that a significant portion of European architectural production focuses on reuse, recycling, and upgrading of the existing built heritage.
- Treccani https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ site visited 05/12/2024 – translation by the author.
- Treccani https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ site visited 05/12/2024 - translation by the author.
- Posocco P. Modificare per conservare. In: La seconda vita degli edifici. Quodlibet; 2016. p. 47–76.
- Machado R. Old buildings as palimpsest: Toward a theory of remodeling. In: Progressive Architecture [Internet]. 1976. p. 46–69. Available from: https://api.seman-ticscholar.org/CorpusID:115251754
- Corboz A. The Land as Palimpsest. Diogenes. 1983 Mar 26;31(121):12–34.
- Wong L. Adaptive Reuse. De Gruyter; 2016.
- Bollack F. Reflection on the art of incomplete. Area. 2016 Sep;4–11.
- Massarente A. Fragments of antiquity in modern architecture. Area. 2016 Sep;144–9.
- Unger RM. The Knowledge Economy. VErso; 2019.
- Roberta Franceschinelli. Spazi del possibile. Roma: Franco Angeli; 2021.
- - guidato dall’Agenda 2030 delle Nazioni Unite e dai suoi Obiettivi di Sviluppo Sostenibile.
- Stone S. Notes towards a Definition of Adaptive Reuse. Architecture. 2023 Aug 28;3(3):477–89.
- Baum M, Christiaansee K. City as Loft. Adaptive Reuse as a resource for sustaina-ble urban development. Zurich: ETH, gta Verlag; 2012. 8–13 p.
- Baum M. Re-use : From Exception to Normality: Re-use in Urban Development. In: Rieniets T, Kretschmann N, Salewski C, editors. Jovis; 2014. p. 154. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/93647.
- Rossetti M. Lacaton A., Vassal J.P., Walker E., Puente M. (a cura di), laca-ton&vassal: free space transformation habiter / espacio libre transformación habiter. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment. 2022 Jul 26;(24):273–4.
- Caliari PF. La forma nel tempo. In: Cattiodoro S, editor. Il fondamento effimero dell’architettura. Rome: Aracne; 2010. p. 7–14.
- Lanz F, Pendlebury J. Adaptive reuse: a critical review. The Journal of Architecture. 2022 Apr 3;27(2–3):441–62.
- The emblematic case of the multi-decade path followed by Giancarlo De Carlo for the city of Urbino serves as a “spiritual father” for many other interventions an policies of public heritage regeneration aimed at adapting it to contemporary uses.
Related articles
in Volume 1/2025, pp. 178-183
Issue contents
pp. 20-25
pp. 26-31
pp. 32-35
pp. 36-39
pp. 40-43
pp. 44-49
pp. 50-53
pp. 58-63
pp. 74-79
pp. 80-85
pp. 92-97
pp. 104-109
pp. 110-113
pp. 114-119
pp. 120-123
pp. 128-133
pp. 134-139
pp. 140-143
pp. 144-147
pp. 164-171
pp. 178-183
pp. 184-191
pp. 236-241
pp. 252-255
pp. 260-265
pp. 266-269
pp. 270-273
pp. 274-279
pp. 280-285
pp. 290-295
pp. 296-301