Abstract
The essay intends to address the theme of interdisciplinarity and the “intersection” of knowledge by examining a competition and research experience involving the Acropolis of Athens. The unequivocal contribution that the Greek experience makes to the world of architec-tural forms can be described in the balanced link that holds together the propensity for “convexity” – manifested by the properly architectural dimension found in the “world above” and here restored by the sculptural modelling of volumes in space – with the most ancient forms of the earth – the “world below” – that is, the “concave” dimension excavated and carved in solid matter, which is proposed as nourishment for architecture that in turn holds the aspirations of human life. But when an architecture loses its function, its form and even its material, when stasis crystallises what re-mains by regressing architecture into archaeology, how can man rediscover in that inert matter the human reasons and values still intimately belonging to our time? The Call of the Piranesi Prix de Rome e d’Athènes, organised by the Accademia Adrianea di Architettura e Archeologia onlus in 2022, is taken as an opportunity to reflect on possible ways to put these ancient rela-tionships back into tension, to hold archaeology and nature together again through the addition of a new formal configuration that aspires to cele-brate, in the past as now, the myth and beauty of this extraordinary place.
Download
Cite this article
Lubrano, O. (2025). From the Darkness of the Underground to the Heavenly Light. A Project for the Acropolis of Athens. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 32-35). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu
References
- Pausania, Guida della Grecia, Libro I. L’attica, Fondazione Lorenzo Valla, Milano 1982.
- T. Wiegand, Die archaische Poros-Architektur der Acropolis zu Athen, Leipzig 1904.
- Athena, perhaps as a gift of thanks to women for the vows they had received, instilled the art of weaving in women. As Homer states «[...] women are weavers of cloths; to them Athena gave in the highest degree to do beautiful works and to have a wise mind». Omero, Odissea, VII, pp. 103-111.
- J. Hillman, Figure del mito (Adelphi, Milano, 2014), p. 63.
- « mistress of the art of weaving - following Hillman again - Athena’s art [is revealed in] the systematic interweaving of all the threads; and just as her person is a combination of reason and necessity, her combinatorial art produces a compact fabric». Ivi, p. 55.
- F. Turato, La crisi della città e l’ideologia del selvaggio nell’Atene del V sec. a.C. (Edizioni dell’ateneo e Bizzarri, Roma, 1979), p. 31.
- The expression synoikismòs (synecism) refers to “higher” values of both an exquisitely topographical and juridical nature, in that all the natives of the extensive territory covered by Attica now represented a community of “cohabitants” “united” in the city-state of Athens. See A. J. Toynbee, Il mondo ellenico (Giulio Einaudi editore, Torino, 1967), pp. 42-51.
- As Paul Valéry warns: «No less than some who will visit it in the future, those who have recently returned there will not have been able to avoid noticing how the ap-pearance of the Acropolis has changed considerably compared to what could be ad-mired only a few decades ago. Even if the works undertaken since the second half of the 1970s to preserve the monuments and make them more accessible are pervasive, even if they are conducted at a moderately sustained pace, it is inevitable to note that the peculiarity of the events of which they are the bearer does not make them substantially different from those that have marked the Acropolis’ past, but rather the most recent, neither unprecedented nor definitive, chapter in its history, yet another demonstration that history while ‘justifying anything, teaches absolutely nothing”». P. Valéry, Sguardi sul mondo attuale (Adelphi, Milano, 1994), p. 36.
- C. Brandi, Viaggio nella Grecia antica (Bompiani, Firenze-Milano, 2007), p. 30.
- M. Heidegger, Soggiorni. Viaggio in Grecia (Ugo Guanda Editore, Parma, 1997), p. 46.
- C. A. Doxiadis, Architectural Space in Ancient Greece, (The MIT Press, Cam-bridge, 1972), pp. 29-38.
- M. Eliade, Il Sacro e il profano (Bollati e Boringhieri, Torino, 1976), pp. 26-28.
- M. Heidegger, Corpo e spazio, osservazioni su arte-scultura-spazio (Il Melangolo, Genova, 2000), p. 37.
- The actions of “covering” and “limiting” can be understood as cornerstones for architectural design. As Ludwig Hilberseimer points out, architecture «[...] consti-tutes a problem of space (and that) we cannot experience a space without limits” be-cause architecture “[...] is situated in space and at the same time encloses it to itself». L. Hilberseimer, Mies van der Rohe (Theobald, Chicago, 1956), trad. it. A. Monestiroli (a cura di), Mies van der Rohe (CLUP, Milano, 1984), p. 45.
- M. Heidegger, op. cit., 1997, p. 49.
- R. Capozzi, F. Costanzo, F. Defilippis, F. Visconti (eds), Patrimonio e progetto di architettura (Quodlibet, Macerata, 2021).
- G. Colli, Filosofia dell’espressione (Adelphi, Milano, 1969), p. 35.
Issue contents
pp. 20-25
pp. 26-31
pp. 32-35
pp. 36-39
pp. 40-43
pp. 44-49
pp. 50-53
pp. 58-63
pp. 74-79
pp. 80-85
pp. 92-97
pp. 104-109
pp. 110-113
pp. 114-119
pp. 120-123
pp. 128-133
pp. 134-139
pp. 140-143
pp. 144-147
pp. 164-171
pp. 178-183
pp. 184-191
pp. 236-241
pp. 252-255
pp. 260-265
pp. 266-269
pp. 270-273
pp. 274-279
pp. 280-285
pp. 290-295
pp. 296-301