Home and Workspace in the Traditional Urban Fabric of Bucharest

  • ”Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning, Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Working from home has been present in the majority of the historical city centres, the house with shop or workshop being one of the most common types of urban dwelling over the centuries. Some of these buildings, which made up a big part of the built environment, are still preserved today, but most of the time they go unnoticed. Following the Covid-19 pandemic there has been a major shift towards working from home. This had direct implications especially on urban housing which had to also accommodate the workspace, making it difficult to handle all the new challenges that appeared trying to balance the complex relationship between them. In this context, the historical buildings that managed to incorporate both hypostases may represent valuable resources for building resilient housing and workspaces in the future. The study will be based on some local works, as well as some case studies from the Bucharest’s urban space, relying at the same time on both bibliographic and archival research. Therefore, the paper outlines some typologies present in Bucharest, exploring the houses of the traditional urban fabric that combined the home and the workspace in search of a better understanding of their or-ganization, characteristics, and the potential that they can have in defining alternative approaches in the current post-pandemic context in which a significant number of people is working from home.

Download

Cite this article

Ilie, O.M. (2025). Home and Workspace in the Traditional Urban Fabric of Bucharest. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 242-247). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu

References

  1. D. Luca, C. Özgüzel, Z. Wei, “The new geography of remote jobs? Evidence from Europe”, OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 57 (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2023).
  2. J.M. Barrero, N. Bloom, S.J. Davis, “The Evolution of Work from Home”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2023), pp. 23-50.
  3. C.G. Aksoy et al., “Working from Home Around the Globe: 2023 Report”, EconPol Policy Brief 53 (2023).
  4. M. Vartiainen, Flexible Hybrid Work (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, 2024).
  5. S. Zaika, S. Shaforenko, “Development of remote work as a new form of work organi-zation”, in Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, No.1 (2024), pp.177-184.
  6. H. Silver, “Working from home: before and after the pandemic”, in Contexts, Vol. 22, No.1 (American Sociological Association, 2023), pp. 66-70.
  7. F. Holliss, Beyond Live/Work: The Architecture of Home-based Work (Routledge, London, 2015).
  8. H. Davis, Living Over the Store: Architecture and Local Urban Life (Routledge, London, 2012).
  9. T. Breda, P. Dutronc-Postel, V. Pecheu, “Gaps between working from home and its feasibility over time and across occupations”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 11121 (2024).
  10. „CP1a - subzona centrală suprapusă peste nucleul istoric”, in Regulamentul Local de Urbanism al Municipiului București (2000).
  11. P. Mortu, “Arhitectura cu specific comercial. Hanurile”, PhD thesis, “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism (2011).
  12. G. Potra, Istoricul Hanurilor Bucureștene (Ed. Științifică și Enciclopedică, București, 1985).
  13. A. Badea, „Hanuri Bucureștene”, in București - Materiale de Istorie și Muzeografie: București - MIM, XXI, No.38 (Muzeul Municipiului București, București, 2007), pp. 219-220.
  14. V. M. Mihăilescu, Bucureștii din punct de vedere antropogeografic și etnografic (Editura Paidea, București, 2003).
  15. V. M. Mihăilescu, Evoluția geografică a unui oraș: București (Editura Paidea, București, 2003).
  16. G. Caniggia, G.L. Maffei, Architecture composition and Building Typology: Interpreting basic buildings (Alinea Editrice, Firenze, 2001).
  17. A. Boldojar, “Potențialul ascuns al morfologiei urbane: curțile bucureștene”, PhD thesis, “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism (2020).
  18. A.M. Zahariade, Arhitectura în proiectul comunist. România 1944-1989 (Ed. Simetria, București, 2011).
  19. E. Creanga, I. Budisteanu, M. Duda, “Sustainable housing for sustainable cities: case study of Bucharest”, in WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 129 (WIT Press, 2010), pp. 595-606.
  20. M. Nae, D. Turnock, “The new Bucharest: Two decades of restructuring”, in Cities, No.28 (2011), pp.206-219.
  21. B. O’Neill, “Off-grid: Trading infrastructure for atmosphere in Bucharest, Romania”, in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, Vol. 0(0) (2024).
  22. L.N. Lyzwinski, “Organizational and occupational health issues with working remote-ly during the pandemic: a scoping review of remote work and health”, in Journal of Occupational Health, Vol. 66, No.1 (Oxford University Press, 2024).
  23. A. Bossi, P. Cecere, Impalpabilul în arhitectură. Vocația oicologică și caracterul cosmotopic al interiorului arhitectural (Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu”, București, 2022).

Issue contents

Adriano Magliocco, Paola Sabbion

pp. 36-39

Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger

pp. 98-103

Sara Ghirardini, Amath Luca Diatta

pp. 104-109

Tanya Brefelean, Ioan-Sergiu Brefelean

pp. 124-127

Sabin-Andrei Țenea

pp. 148-155

Adelina Gabriela Lupu

pp. 156-159

Antonio De Rossi, Carlo Deregibus, Matteo Tempestini

pp. 184-191

Camilla Donantoni

pp. 204-209

Greta Allegretti, Pietro Brunazzi

pp. 210-215

Vlad Iosif

pp. 216-219

Astrid Rottman, Diana Pascu

pp. 220-225

Oana Maria Ilie
Home and Workspace in the Traditional Urban Fabric of Bucharest

pp. 242-247

Mihaela Pelteacu, Alexandra Diana Dunel, Alexandra Diana Stan

pp. 280-285