The Approval of the Ministry of Culture, a Means of Preserving the Heritage Attributes in the Process of Intervention on Historical Monuments

  • “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning, Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

The paper analyses the issue of the approval/consent, documents issued by the Ministry of Culture through its specialized departments and decentralized public services, in the context of carrying out intervention works on historical monuments, implicitly of protecting the heritage component. Constituting a filter with official, legal value, guaranteeing that under the conditions of respecting the rigors stipulated by the matter of the technical documentation that was the basis for substantiating the fulfilment of its legal requirements, then the quality of the works carried out should simultaneously respond to the requirements of preserving the authenticity of the built heritage and those of increasing the lifespan of the building and/ or adapting it to its current functional requirements. The study analyses the significance of the approval issued by the Ministry of Culture for intervention works on historical monuments, the multifactorial determinants that contribute to the approval decision, the supporting specialized documentation, the main barriers that can distort or alter its issue, some proposals and future lines of study that could contribute to its efficiency.

Download

Cite this article

Neagoe, C.A. (2025). The Approval of the Ministry of Culture, a Means of Preserving the Heritage Attributes in the Process of Intervention on Historical Monuments. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 54-57). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu

References

  1. D. Barthel-Bouchier, Cultural heritage and the challenge of sustainability (Rout-ledge, New York, 2013), 235p.
  2. R. M. Crisan, Rehabilitation of built heritage. Theory and technique (in Romanian), (Ozalid, Bucharest, 2023), 376p. Law No. 422 of 18 July 2001 (republished) On the protection of historical monu-ments.
  3. D. Mısırlısoy, K. Günçe, “Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 91–98 (2016).
  4. R. Pickard (Ed.), Policy and law in heritage conservation, Vol. 1 (Taylor & Francis, New York, 2001), 348p.
  5. Ministry of Culture, Preliminary Theses of the Cultural Heritage Code (Romanian Government Decision No. 905/2016), 2016.
  6. Report of the Presidential Commission for Built Heritage, Historical and Natural Sites, ICR Publishing House, 402p, 2010.
  7. A. Crăciunescu, “Authenticity – a factor not addressed by the domestic legislation, but decisive in UNESCO’s assessment” (in Romanian), Plural. History, Culture, Society, 6(2), 41–62 (2018).
  8. C.A. Neagoe, Inventory and analysis legislation report: Immovable cultural heritage – historical monuments and archaeology (in Romanian), for the Cultural Heritage Code, Ministry of Culture and National Identity, 2019. https://www.umpcultura.ro/monumenteistorice
  9. Law No. 10 of 18 January 1995 (republished) On the quality in constructions.
  10. Law No. 50 of 29 July 1991 (republished) On the approval of execution of con-struction works.
  11. C. A. Neagoe, “Current issues and challenges for disaster risk management of cultural heritage in Romania”, Institute of Disaster Mitigation for Urban Cultural Heritage, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan, 2018.
  12. Order No. 3.037 of July 20, 2020 for the approval of the procedure regarding the prior notification and issuance of written consent, in the case of the execution of works, under the conditions provided for in art. 11 para. (2) and (4) of Law no. 50/1991 regarding the authorization of the execution of construction works.
  13. Order No. 2.797 of November 14, 2017 on establishing the types of interventions on historical monuments, buildings in their protection areas or in Protected areas that slightly affect the historical substance and/or are temporary and the conditions under which approvals may be issued without consulting the National Commis-sion for Historical Monuments, respectively the zonal commissions for historical monuments.

Related articles

Issue contents

Adriano Magliocco, Paola Sabbion

pp. 36-39

Cătălin Andrei Neagoe
The Approval of the Ministry of Culture, a Means of Preserving the Heritage Attributes in the Process of Intervention on Historical Monuments

pp. 54-57

Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger

pp. 98-103

Sara Ghirardini, Amath Luca Diatta

pp. 104-109

Tanya Brefelean, Ioan-Sergiu Brefelean

pp. 124-127

Sabin-Andrei Țenea

pp. 148-155

Adelina Gabriela Lupu

pp. 156-159

Antonio De Rossi, Carlo Deregibus, Matteo Tempestini

pp. 184-191

Camilla Donantoni

pp. 204-209

Greta Allegretti, Pietro Brunazzi

pp. 210-215

Vlad Iosif

pp. 216-219

Astrid Rottman, Diana Pascu

pp. 220-225

Mihaela Pelteacu, Alexandra Diana Dunel, Alexandra Diana Stan

pp. 280-285