Integrating Obsolete Military Built Heritage Into Urban Life. A Comparative Analysis of Community Engagement Within the Valorization of Brialmont’s Fortifications in Romania and Belgium.

  • “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism

Abstract

Architectural obsolescence acts as a catalyst in the process of abandonment, exerting a considerable influence on the destiny of built heritage. In the context of military edifices, this concept pertains to the decommissioning of a building, due to its inability to remain aligned with the fast-paced advancements in technology. Military built heritage is frequently the subject of abandonment due to ignorance of its patrimonial values, the absence of adequate protection measures and a lack of community engagement. The consequences of this type of anthropogenic disaster affect both the tangible and the intangible values of these structures, lea-ding to: fragmentation, collapse, vandalism, loss of symbolic identity and disconnection from the urban fabric. The current state of the Bucharest Fortress, designed by H. Brialmont, reflects the narrative of an unfulfilled destiny. The disarming of the fortifications in 1916 marked the commencement of decay and decline, resulting in the abandonment of the majority of the ensemble. Conversely, the defense belts built by the same general in Belgium, during approximately the same period, have been revitalised as a result of community involvement. In the light of the aforementioned cases, this essay aims to showcase a comparative analysis between the current state of Brialmont’s fortifications in Romania and Belgium, with regard to the role that community plays in the valorization of built military heritage. The paper will be developed by means of bibliographic, historical and comparative research, focusing on how participatory initiatives, linked to preservation and adaptive reuse, can instill a sense of ownership and facilitate the cultural integration of the Bucharest Fortress, based on the successful examples of Liège, Namur and Antwerp. This study is essential for highlighting the vital role that communities play in the fate of abandoned military built heritage, representing the pivotal factor, able to revitalize the Romanian fortification belt.

Download

Cite this article

Haiduc, S. (2025). Integrating Obsolete Military Built Heritage Into Urban Life. A Comparative Analysis of Community Engagement Within the Valorization of Brialmont’s Fortifications in Romania and Belgium.. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 256-259). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu

References

  1. ICOMOS, ICOMOS Guidelines on Fortifications and Military Heritage, (ICOMOS, 2017), pp. 1, 6.
  2. M. Mureșanu, “Defending defences. A parallel between two cases: Loncin and Bu-charest”, in EAAE Transactions on Architectural Education, (no. 65, EAAE, Hasselt, 2017), p. 201.
  3. D. R. Fiorino, “Europa ‘trincerata’. Scenari di riuso”, in Paesaggi militari del Campo Trincerato di Roma Progetti per FORTE AURELIA, (Politecnico di Torino, Torino, 2020), p. 44.
  4. M. Ripp and S. Hauer, “Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification”, in Built Heritage, 2017.
  5. UNESCO, “Decision 31 COM 13B. The “fifth C” for “Communities””, in WHC-07/31.COM/24 Decisions report, (31st Session of the World Heritage Committee, Christchurch, 2007), p. 193.
  6. M. Ripp and S. Hauer, “Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification”, in Built Heritage, 2017.
  7. M. Ripp and S. Hauer, “Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification”, in Built Heritage, 2017.
  8. E. Wenger-Trayner and B. Wenger-Trayner and P. Reid and C. Bruderlein, Commu-nities of practice within and across organizations a guidebook, (Social Learning Lab, Sesimbra, 2023), p. 200.
  9. A. Tudor, “Guvernul a aprobat transformarea Fortului 13 Jilava în muzeu”, in Bule-tin. De BUCUREȘTI, (June 29, 2024). Available at: https://buletin.de/bucuresti/guver-">https://buletin.de/bucuresti/guver-nul-a-aprobat-transformarea-fortului-13-jilava-in-muzeu/. [Accessed 09.10.2024]
  10. Source: https://forturi.ro/2022/09/01/expozitia-forturile-capitalei-imagini-din-vii-">https://forturi.ro/2022/09/01/expozitia-forturile-capitalei-imagini-din-viitor/. [Accessed 13.10.2024]
  11. Sourhttps://www.visitardenne.com/en/best-ardennes/iconic-sites/forts-prov-">ce:https://www.visitardenne.com/en/best-ardennes/iconic-sites/forts-https://www.visitardenne.com/en/best-ardennes/iconic-sites/forts-prov-">province-liege.[Accessed 11.10.2024]
  12. Source: https://www.fortengordels.be/">https://www.fortengordels.be/. [Accessed 07.10.2024]
  13. RFC INTERREG EUROPE, Masterplan Fort Lier, (version 13, 25 October 2023), p.
  14. E. Wenger-Trayner and B. Wenger-Trayner and P. Reid and C. Bruderlein, Commu-nities of practice within and across organizations a guidebook, (Social Learning Lab, Sesimbra, 2023), p. 119.
  15. Source: https://www.fortdelantin.be/">https://www.fortdelantin.be/. [Accessed 23.10.2024]

Issue contents

Adriano Magliocco, Paola Sabbion

pp. 36-39

Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger

pp. 98-103

Sara Ghirardini, Amath Luca Diatta

pp. 104-109

Tanya Brefelean, Ioan-Sergiu Brefelean

pp. 124-127

Sabin-Andrei Țenea

pp. 148-155

Adelina Gabriela Lupu

pp. 156-159

Antonio De Rossi, Carlo Deregibus, Matteo Tempestini

pp. 184-191

Camilla Donantoni

pp. 204-209

Greta Allegretti, Pietro Brunazzi

pp. 210-215

Vlad Iosif

pp. 216-219

Astrid Rottman, Diana Pascu

pp. 220-225

Simina Haiduc
Integrating Obsolete Military Built Heritage Into Urban Life. A Comparative Analysis of Community Engagement Within the Valorization of Brialmont’s Fortifications in Romania and Belgium.

pp. 256-259

Mihaela Pelteacu, Alexandra Diana Dunel, Alexandra Diana Stan

pp. 280-285