Architectural Composition as an Acknowledgement Tool for Archaeology; The Case of Paestum Archaeological Park

  • University of Aldo Moro Bari, Italy
  • University of Federico II, Naples, Italy

Abstract

Archaeological sites serve as dynamic spaces that narrate stories across time, using their fragmented structures to reveal hidden histories and evoke lost environments. These ruins, far from being static remnants, invite reinterpretation and imaginative engagement. By exploring their spatial arrangements, we can uncover layers of architectural composition that offer insights into both their historical form and their current fragmented state. This dual perspective allows for reconstructions that envision their past completeness and an appreciation of their present condition as cultural artifacts.

Ruins, in their incompleteness, become catalysts for imagination, bridging the tangible and intangible aspects of history. The act of reconstructing spaces from fragments is inherently selective and interpretive, requiring deliberate choices that shape how these sites are perceived and experienced. This process transforms ruins into legible compositions that com-municate a coherent narrative, blending past and present into an evolving dialogue. By reimagining these spaces, architects and designers can work on heritage while creating immersive experiences that transcend temporal boundaries, offering a richer understanding of history and its connection to contemporary design.

This paper investigates how architectural composition defines the spatiality of archaeological parks, focusing on the interplay between archaeology and architecture. It draws on a didactic experience of Master thesis at the University of Naples Federico II (Master of Science in Architecture and Heritage, 2024–2025, with supervision of Professors Federica Visconti and Renato Capozzi) that explores these themes through a study of Paestum archaeological park.

Download

Cite this article

Mollahosseinali, P., & Nourbakhsh, S. (2025). Architectural Composition as an Acknowledgement Tool for Archaeology; The Case of Paestum Archaeological Park. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 44-49). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu

References

  1. G. Simmel, “Die Ruine”, in Philosophische Kultur, translated as La Rovina in “Rivis-ta di Estetica”,no. 8, edited by G. Carchia (1981), p. 135.
  2. V. Gregotti, Il territorio dell’architettura (Feltrinelli, Milan, 1966), p. 145.
  3. Giorgio Grassi’s project for the Castle of Abbiategrasso focused on the restoration and adaptive reuse of the historical structure, blending modern interventions with the castle’s original medieval elements. The design aimed to highlight the architec-tural integrity of the site while providing a functional space for contemporary use, respecting its cultural heritage.
  4. Luigi Franciosini, is a distinguished Italian architect and professor in University Roma Tre, known for his innovative approach to architectural design and his contri-butions to architectural theory. As a faculty member in Italy, he has influenced a new generation of architects through both his academic work and practical projects.
  5. L. Franciosini and G. Volpe and M. Turchia, Modelos de Paisajes Patrimoniales: Estrategias de Protección e Intervención Arquitectónica (Valladolid, Spain, 2017).
  6. M. Antoniciello, Il paedsggio e le forme antiche dell’abitare, Doctoral thesis, Doctoral Program in Risk and Sustainability in Civil, Building, and Environmental Engineering Systems,XXXII (2016-2019).
  7. A Cenatio is a term from ancient Roman architecture that refers to the dining room or banquet hall, typically found in Roman villas or wealthy households. It was the space where the family and guests gathered for meals, often featuring elaborate decorations, and sometimes located near the center of the home for easy access. The cenatio was an important space for socializing and entertaining in Roman culture.
  8. A stibadium (or stibadium) was a type of Roman dining couch or semicircular couch used in the ancient Roman triclinium (dining room). It allowed guests to recline during meals, which was the customary dining posture in Roman society. The stibadium typically formed part of the arrangement in the triclinium, where diners would lie on couches around a central table, creating a more relaxed and social atmosphere during banquets and feasts. It was often elaborately decorated, with cushions and fine textiles.
  9. M. P. Napoli, “Paestum I – II century AD” ,Paestum, Archaeological Site Notice, Northern Insulae, House IS n.2-4.
  10. R. Capozzi and F. Visconti and G. Fusco, Architettura e paesaggi dell’archeologia, (Aion edition, Napoli, Italy, 2019) pp.20_23.
  11. U. Schröder, Pardié: Konzept für eine Stadt nach dem Zeitregime der Moderne (Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König, Köln, 2015).
  12. F. De Coulanges, “The Ancient City: A Study on the Religion, Laws, and Institu-tions of Greece and Rome” (Sansoni, Florence, 1972), p. 66.
  13. G. Grassi, Leon Battista Alberti and Roman Architecture (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
  14. R. Capozzi and F. Visconti and G. Fusco, Architettura e paesaggi dell’archeologia, (Aion edition, Napoli, Italy, 2019) pp.20_23.

Issue contents

Adriano Magliocco, Paola Sabbion

pp. 36-39

Parastou Mollahosseinali, Seyedamirhossein Nourbakhsh
Architectural Composition as an Acknowledgement Tool for Archaeology; The Case of Paestum Archaeological Park

pp. 44-49

Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger

pp. 98-103

Sara Ghirardini, Amath Luca Diatta

pp. 104-109

Tanya Brefelean, Ioan-Sergiu Brefelean

pp. 124-127

Sabin-Andrei Țenea

pp. 148-155

Adelina Gabriela Lupu

pp. 156-159

Antonio De Rossi, Carlo Deregibus, Matteo Tempestini

pp. 184-191

Camilla Donantoni

pp. 204-209

Greta Allegretti, Pietro Brunazzi

pp. 210-215

Vlad Iosif

pp. 216-219

Astrid Rottman, Diana Pascu

pp. 220-225

Mihaela Pelteacu, Alexandra Diana Dunel, Alexandra Diana Stan

pp. 280-285