Abstract
Based on archival research and theoretical studies this paper addresses the problem of the multi-storey apartment buildings in Bucha-rest of the 1930’s, highlighting them as one of the most significant typol-ogies in European urban housing history. Following clear principles that incorporate the new ideas of modern architecture along with the mentali-ties and the morals of the time, these buildings reveal a subtle relationship between tradition and innovation, that is to be discussed.
Concerning this matter, a work-in-progress collection of remarkable buildings, exponents of the open courtyard typology, will be reviewed centring the discourse on their typological autonomy and relationship with the urban space. The buildings to be discussed include Luterană 3 & Calea Victoriei 122 (by arch. Tiberiu Niga ), Luterană 5 & Nicolae Bălcescu 24 (by arch. State Balosin ), Vasile Conta 7-9 (by arch. Eugen Botez).
The courtyard, along with the distribution system, will be subjected to analysis through the utilisation of vectorised plans. This analysis will serve to identify and recognise the courtyard as a fundamental spatial device, operating at the level of building composition and plot insertion.
The architects explored various formulas for the courtyard, imagining it as a garden, entrance or street, double-crossing courtyard, terrace or
other combinations that have the potential to generate a variety of forms and paths. These qualities were no longer considered in housing projects carried out following the postwar years.
Making no distinction between public and private, placed in the extension of public space, the courtyard experienced its final moment of glory through this typology, after a tremendously, long history.
This paper aims to draw attention to the hidden figures of modernist architecture, encompassing the buildings themselves, the courtyards as distinct elements and the architects behind them. Furthermore, it seeks to highlight the worrying phenomenon of a significant architectural tipology (multi-storey apartment buildings with courtyards) becoming devoid of its original meaning at the level of urban practice and human consciousness.
Download
Cite this article
Pelteacu, M., & Dunel, A.D., & Stan, A.D. (2025). Hidden Figures of Bucharest. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 280-285). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu
References
- Jean-Jacques TREUTTEL, Jean Claude GARCIAS, Jérôme TREUTTEL. “Un type mort-né: La cour ouverte”. În: Catherine BRUANT, Patrick CELESTE, Jean-Jacques TREUTTEL (ed.). L’immeuble. Les cahiers de la recherche architecturale. Editions Parenthèses, 1988. Pp.20-31.
- Cristiana, MAZZONI. De la ville-parc à l’immeuble à cour ouverte, Paris (1919-1939), Thèse de doctorat en Urbanisme, Université Paris 8, Paris, 2000. As cited in: Amina, HARZALLAH. “Le rôle du soleil dans le remodelage des formes architec-turales et urbaines pendant la période hygiéniste en France”. In: Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea, 54, 2/2023, 29/06/2023. P.68.
- BRESSANI, Martin, « The Spectacle of the City of Paris from 25bis rue Franklin », Assemblage No. 12 (Aug., 1990), The MIT Press, p.91
- Op. Cit.p.95
- This information can be found in the archives of the Municipality of Bucharest, nr. of file: 672/1932 1 Yellow
- Mihaela, PELTEACU (ed.). 3 Imobile Remarcabile. Caiet de Însemnări. Editura universitară “Ion Mincu”, 2023.
- Mihaela, PELTEACU (ed.). Imobile de Raport: E. Botez, S. Baloșin, H. Delavran-cea-Gibory, M. Maller, T. Niga. Editura universitară “Ion Mincu”, 2024.
Issue contents
pp. 20-25
pp. 26-31
pp. 32-35
pp. 36-39
pp. 40-43
pp. 44-49
pp. 50-53
pp. 58-63
pp. 74-79
pp. 80-85
pp. 92-97
pp. 104-109
pp. 110-113
pp. 114-119
pp. 120-123
pp. 128-133
pp. 134-139
pp. 140-143
pp. 144-147
pp. 164-171
pp. 178-183
pp. 184-191
pp. 236-241
pp. 252-255
pp. 260-265
pp. 266-269
pp. 270-273
pp. 274-279
pp. 280-285
pp. 290-295
pp. 296-301