Abstract
When discussing heritage in architecture, we often focus on buildings or areas with overtly valuable characteristics, such as historical age, urban context, cultural significance, or intrinsic aesthetic value. How-ever, there exists a less apparent heritage, often overlooked because it lies concealed within the depths of urban plots. In the context of dwelling, the architectural heritage of cities includes diverse modes of living that have evolved, persisted, and transformed alongside the buildings that house them. For the historical fabric of Bucharest, one of the most significant typologies is the wagon house, a model that emerged during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. While the construction period represents a fixed moment in time, the associated ways of living evolve gradually, reflecting the latent imprints of the city from different historical periods. The prominent spaces within these houses, those visible from the street, are complemented by a network of minor, hidden spaces that are essen-tial for their functional and formal coherence. This study examines the vulnerability of wagon houses and especially of minor spaces within them through selected case studies, analysing patterns of urban densification that have impacted them. By revisiting these examples, the paper proposes an alternative approach to urban densification, emphasising the signifi-cance of minor spaces as cultural heritage in sustaining the character and of historical urban fabric.
Download
Cite this article
Florea, Z. (2025). The Minor Space as Cultural Heritage: Versatility and Resilience in the Bucharest Context. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 252-255). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu
References
- Theodor Rădulescu, „Terenul și locuința la orașe”, Locuința în România, U.O.R. „Biblioteca Urbanistica”, no. 15-16, Institutul Urbanistic al României, București, 13 (1957).
- Pier Vittorio Aureli and Maria Shéhérazade Giudici,”Familiar Horror: Toward a Critique Of Domestic Space”, Log, No. 38, 105 (Fall 2016).
- Duiliu Marcu, G. M. Cantacuzino, R. Bolomey, I. Davidescu, T. Rădulescu, Primăria Municipiului București. Planul director de sistematizare. Rezumat al memoriului justificativ, Institului Urbanistic al României, București, 18 (1935).
- B., „Case bune. – Viață lungă”, Viitorul, no. 169, 1 (22 May, 1908).
Issue contents
pp. 20-25
pp. 26-31
pp. 32-35
pp. 36-39
pp. 40-43
pp. 44-49
pp. 50-53
pp. 58-63
pp. 74-79
pp. 80-85
pp. 92-97
pp. 104-109
pp. 110-113
pp. 114-119
pp. 120-123
pp. 128-133
pp. 134-139
pp. 140-143
pp. 144-147
pp. 164-171
pp. 178-183
pp. 184-191
pp. 236-241
pp. 252-255
pp. 260-265
pp. 266-269
pp. 270-273
pp. 274-279
pp. 280-285
pp. 290-295
pp. 296-301