The Minor Space as Cultural Heritage: Versatility and Resilience in the Bucharest Context

  • Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism

Abstract

When discussing heritage in architecture, we often focus on buildings or areas with overtly valuable characteristics, such as historical age, urban context, cultural significance, or intrinsic aesthetic value. How-ever, there exists a less apparent heritage, often overlooked because it lies concealed within the depths of urban plots. In the context of dwelling, the architectural heritage of cities includes diverse modes of living that have evolved, persisted, and transformed alongside the buildings that house them. For the historical fabric of Bucharest, one of the most significant typologies is the wagon house, a model that emerged during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. While the construction period represents a fixed moment in time, the associated ways of living evolve gradually, reflecting the latent imprints of the city from different historical periods. The prominent spaces within these houses, those visible from the street, are complemented by a network of minor, hidden spaces that are essen-tial for their functional and formal coherence. This study examines the vulnerability of wagon houses and especially of minor spaces within them through selected case studies, analysing patterns of urban densification that have impacted them. By revisiting these examples, the paper proposes an alternative approach to urban densification, emphasising the signifi-cance of minor spaces as cultural heritage in sustaining the character and of historical urban fabric.

Download

Cite this article

Florea, Z. (2025). The Minor Space as Cultural Heritage: Versatility and Resilience in the Bucharest Context. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 252-255). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu

References

  1. Theodor Rădulescu, „Terenul și locuința la orașe”, Locuința în România, U.O.R. „Biblioteca Urbanistica”, no. 15-16, Institutul Urbanistic al României, București, 13 (1957).
  2. Pier Vittorio Aureli and Maria Shéhérazade Giudici,”Familiar Horror: Toward a Critique Of Domestic Space”, Log, No. 38, 105 (Fall 2016).
  3. Duiliu Marcu, G. M. Cantacuzino, R. Bolomey, I. Davidescu, T. Rădulescu, Primăria Municipiului București. Planul director de sistematizare. Rezumat al memoriului justificativ, Institului Urbanistic al României, București, 18 (1935).
  4. B., „Case bune. – Viață lungă”, Viitorul, no. 169, 1 (22 May, 1908).

Issue contents

Adriano Magliocco, Paola Sabbion

pp. 36-39

Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger

pp. 98-103

Sara Ghirardini, Amath Luca Diatta

pp. 104-109

Tanya Brefelean, Ioan-Sergiu Brefelean

pp. 124-127

Sabin-Andrei Țenea

pp. 148-155

Adelina Gabriela Lupu

pp. 156-159

Antonio De Rossi, Carlo Deregibus, Matteo Tempestini

pp. 184-191

Camilla Donantoni

pp. 204-209

Greta Allegretti, Pietro Brunazzi

pp. 210-215

Vlad Iosif

pp. 216-219

Astrid Rottman, Diana Pascu

pp. 220-225

Zenaida Florea
The Minor Space as Cultural Heritage: Versatility and Resilience in the Bucharest Context

pp. 252-255

Mihaela Pelteacu, Alexandra Diana Dunel, Alexandra Diana Stan

pp. 280-285