Abstract
Architecture builds the city in detail. Space, whether urban, architectural or landscape, arouses such intense sensations and feelings that it inspires intellect and reason. However, those who experience the city of the present are often unaware of the archaeological, artistic and architectural heritage it possesses, and the need to consider the places and architecture of the historic city as historical-material-environmental permanences is becoming increasingly urgent.
Significant is the case of the former Church of San Lorenzo di Castello in Venice, which still stands today in its majestic grandeur; a place evocative of past events, in which echoes of successive generations and memories of splendours now faded remain. In fact, over time it has lost its formal and functional essentiality, thus becoming emblematic of a critical condition that often involves historical and especially religious buildings.
The uniqueness of this space also inspired the architect Renzo Piano in 1984, who created the temporary installation for Luigi Nono’s Prometheus, a musical work recently revived on its 40th anniversary.
The increasingly evident phenomena of material decay and static instability made it necessary to carry out some preliminary investigations prior to consolidation and restoration work recently realized to reopen the building to the city as Ocean Space, a global center presenting exhibitions, installations, research and public programs to promote critical literacy on the Ocean and environmental protection through the arts promoted by the TBA21 Academy.
This, then, is the meaning of ‘rethinking what exists’: to give back its own modernity to a building anachronistically at odds with its real belonging to contemporaneity, demonstrating the need for a consistent change to survive in time and to return to fulfil a noble task that is now earthly, no longer spiritual.
The theme that manifests itself in its contemporary paradox, in a city like Venice - that is the essence of paradox - is today a necessity and primarily an opportunity: to build to preserve. The real contradiction of conservation, or rather of memory, is that it needs to change, just as it needs to repeat itself in order to be preserved.
Download
Cite this article
Donantoni, C. (2025). Rethinking What Exists. In Architectural Experiences, 1, (pp. 204-209). Editura Universitară Ion Mincu
References
- Franzoi U./Di Stefano D., Le chiese di Venezia, Venezia, Alfieri, 1976;
- S. Settis., Futuro del “classico”, Torino, Giulio Einaudi Editore, 2004
- S. Settis., Se Venezia muore, Torino, Giulio Einaudi Editore, 2014
- Cacciari M. (a cura di), Luigi Nono. Verso Prometeo, Ricordi, Milano-Venezia, 1984;
- De Min M., La chiesa di San Lorenzo di castello a venezia. Le fasi costruttive dal IX al XII secolo: alcune analogie con San Marco, in “Scienza e tecnica del restauro della Basilica di San Marco, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi”, Istituto Veneto di SS.LL.AA., Venezia, 16-19 maggio 1995, Padova 1999, pp. 189-217;
- Doglioni F., Nel restauro. Progetti per le architetture del passato, Marsilio, Venezia, 2008;
- Doglioni F./Mirabella Roberti G. (a cura di), Venezia. Forme della costruzione Forme del dissesto, Libreria Cluva Editrice, Venezia, 2011;
- Donantoni C., Zigiotto M., Ripensare l’esistente. Il caso della Chiesa di San Lorenzo a Venezia. Esiti di una riflessione didattica, Mogliano Veneto, Arcari Editore, 2015.
Issue contents
pp. 20-25
pp. 26-31
pp. 32-35
pp. 36-39
pp. 40-43
pp. 44-49
pp. 50-53
pp. 58-63
pp. 74-79
pp. 80-85
pp. 92-97
pp. 104-109
pp. 110-113
pp. 114-119
pp. 120-123
pp. 128-133
pp. 134-139
pp. 140-143
pp. 144-147
pp. 164-171
pp. 178-183
pp. 184-191
pp. 204-209
pp. 236-241
pp. 252-255
pp. 260-265
pp. 266-269
pp. 270-273
pp. 274-279
pp. 280-285
pp. 290-295
pp. 296-301